What should an investor verify first?

DPI (distributions to paid-in capital) as a running figure tracked each quarter, not just annually.

Which documents matter most?

Quarterly and capital-account statements disclosing cumulative distributions and paid-in capital.

What is the main downside to test?

Comparing DPI against a generic industry average rather than funds of the same age and strategy.

How should the final decision be made?

Track DPI explicitly rather than inferring realised progress from a rising NAV alone.

Back to JournalPrivate-Market Performance and Monitoring

How to Track DPI Across a Fund’s Life

Urvashi L1 min read

Understanding the Reported Outcome

DPI (Distributions to Paid-In capital) measures cash actually returned to investors relative to capital actually called — unlike TVPI, which blends in the manager's own unrealised marks, DPI is built entirely from money that has actually moved, making it the most concrete, least subjective performance figure a fund reports.

Reading Cash, Value and Timing Together

DPI should be read alongside the fund's age and vintage, since it naturally starts at zero and grows only as exits occur — a young fund's low DPI says nothing negative on its own, but the trajectory across successive quarters is exactly what an investor should be tracking as the primary signal of realised progress.

Where Monitoring Can Mislead

A rising TVPI driven mostly by unrealised marks can create a false sense of progress while DPI stays flat for years — the gap between the two, tracked over time, is often the most honest indicator of how much of a fund's paper performance has actually converted into cash.

Making the Ongoing Decision

Track DPI at every quarterly report as a running figure, comparing it not just to the fund's own prior quarter but to typical benchmarks for funds of the same age and strategy — a 5-year-old venture fund and a 5-year-old private-credit fund should have very different DPI expectations.

DPI is the single clearest signal of realised, in-hand liquidity — track it explicitly rather than inferring progress from a rising NAV alone.

Key takeaways

DPI (cash distributed relative to capital paid in) is the clearest measure of realised, in-hand liquidity.
Track it as a running figure each quarter, not just at the annual meeting.
Benchmark DPI against funds of the same age and strategy, not a generic industry average.
A rising NAV alone does not substitute for tracking actual realised distributions via DPI.

More in Private-Market Performance and Monitoring

Continue with the other chapters in this module.

Private-Market Performance and MonitoringHow to Monitor an AIF After InvestingMonitoring an AIF after committing capital is an active, ongoing process, not a passive wait for the fund's eventual exit.Private-Market Performance and MonitoringHow to Read an AIF Quarterly ReportA quarterly report is the primary window an investor has into a fund between its annual meetings, and reading it well means connecting several sections together rather than skimming the summary...Private-Market Performance and MonitoringHow to Read an AIF Capital-Account StatementA capital-account statement is the official, administrator-issued record of an individual investor's specific position in a fund — distinct from the fund-level quarterly report, and the document...