Back to JournalPrivate-Market Portfolio Construction

How to Build a ₹3 Crore Private-Market Portfolio

Anurag Y1 min read

Defining the Portfolio Role

At a ₹3 crore corpus earmarked for private markets, the ₹1 crore AIF minimum ticket means a single commitment can represent a full third of the entire allocation — concentration risk becomes the dominant design constraint well before strategy selection does.

Liquidity, Pacing and Commitment Structure

A practical structure at this size might be two to three commitments spread across different strategies and vintage years, rather than three simultaneous commitments in the same year — sequencing matters more here than at larger corpus sizes, since the minimum ticket size leaves little room for error. Keep a meaningful liquid reserve outside the ₹3 crore figure itself to cover capital calls without forcing a sale of other assets.

Where Portfolio Construction Breaks

The common mistake at this scale is treating three AIF tickets as automatically 'diversified' simply because they are three different funds — if all three share a similar vintage year and a correlated sector (for instance, three technology-focused VC funds), the portfolio remains concentrated in substance, regardless of the manager count.

Making the Allocation Decision

Before acting, write down: the specific strategy and vintage-year spread across the intended commitments; the liquid reserve held outside this ₹3 crore figure specifically for capital calls; the correlation between the chosen managers' underlying sectors; and a plan for adding a fourth commitment only after distributions from earlier ones have started.

At this corpus size, sequencing commitments over time is often more important to real diversification than which specific fund is chosen first.

Key takeaways

  • At ₹3 crore, a single ₹1 crore AIF ticket represents a third of the whole allocation — concentration is the dominant constraint.
  • Sequence 2-3 commitments across different strategies and vintage years rather than committing simultaneously.
  • Three funds are not automatically diversified if they share a similar vintage and correlated sector.
  • Sequencing over time is often more important to real diversification than the first fund chosen.

Related questions

What should an investor verify first?

How much of the ₹3 crore corpus a single ₹1 crore AIF ticket represents, since concentration is the dominant constraint at this size.

How does sequencing affect the right approach?

Spreading 2-3 commitments across different strategies and vintage years matters more than at larger corpus sizes.

What is the main downside to test?

Assuming three AIF tickets are automatically diversified, when they may share a similar vintage and correlated sector.

How should the final decision be made?

Add a further commitment only after distributions from earlier ones have started, prioritising sequencing over speed.

Need personalized advice?

Schedule a conversation about your private market allocation goals.

Request an advisory call